Bolsonaro’s Challenges Facing the Reality of a Multipolar World

By the Philosopher

Michael Wagner Sigurdrsson

I am a young man, a philosopher graduated with a Bachelor’s degree from a Brazilian public university, who, talking to many people, declare to many that my Destiny is not in that country for a number of reasons… My ancestors came to Brazil from far away not in the best of conditions, to say the least, they were deceived and were rather disillusioned with what they found, and indeed what they found was much toil , and even war, in these southern parts of the country. For a series of personal reasons and even for personal projects that are not feasible in Brazil or in the short term, I am of the opinion that perhaps my future lies in Europe. But honestly, I’m not sure about that, in fact, in terms of certainties I have very few of them, and they are Theological, Metaphysical, among other Philosophical areas. However, what am I talking about anyway?

            Now, in fact, this country is, among many other countries that are not, in a favourable economic situation compared to those that are in recession, or maybe even to the point of economic collapse. This government and its leader, Jair Messias Bolsonaro, did everything in their power to shield and prepare the country in such a way economically that we would not only not enter recession, economic shrinkage, or even a relative period of hyperinflation, but as the main data show, we are much better than the USA, England, Germany, or Italy, or many others. The government has done many memorable works with former minister Tarcísio Gomes de Freitas, who many speculate, if he wins as Governor of São Paulo this year, he will run for the presidency in 2026; in addition, the federal government carried out the social security reform, changed the guidelines and methodologies and ideological content of education «which is largely Marxist, Frankfurtian and anti-democratic (from the left)», defended freedom of expression, took a stand against the tyranny of the STF «Federal Court of Justice», carried out a great agrarian reform, &c. It can be said that, in the totality of everything that one could say positive about this government, which was, despite the flaws that we can also point out, the best government of this country in more than twenty years.

            It is obvious that there are serious economic and social problems in this country, let me show you some «with some prints and references»:

            Yes, your lordships read it very well, ‘almost half of Brazilians do not have access to the sewage system’[1], in other words, if the population of Brazil was estimated at 212,559,417, that is, two hundred and twelve million, five hundred and fifty nine thousand and four hundred and seventeen people[2] in the year 2020, something around more than 100 million! of people in this country did not have access to sewage that year. This is horrible and detrimental to health, including possible sewage seepage into food growing sites, which can endanger human and other animal health. But it is clear that previous governments are undoubtedly largely responsible for this, and this government has inherited many previous problems, sometimes quite serious ones like this one. I will mention a few more problems, two serious news that we have to recognize, problems that have been going on for many years and that, with the participation of this country in the BRICS, we should, together with this economic bloc, try to if solved «also with prints and fonts»:

            This is perhaps a very serious problem, only not more serious than the previous one presented, because it afflicts a substantially smaller number of people, but alas! there are tens of millions of people without drinking water…[3] It doesn’t need to be said that this is a great absurdity!

Some families still govern in many regions of this country and also around the world that hold ~99% of the economic power, either of the States, that is, those behind the States and governments, and those that are behind the media «MEDIA in Latin is the nominative plural of MEDIVM or medium , which can be translated as a medium, that is, the media is the means of propagating the ideologies (big media are outlets or political pamphlets) that serve as the domain of these mafia families». One of these families, named Nathan Meyer Rothschild, said the following in English in England:

An infamous Rothschild family member.

Who controls the guarantee of money controls the government!”, which in Portuguese means: “Quem controla a emissão de dinheiro controla o governo!”. It was always these people, that is, high finance, governments and families of demagogues who owned much of the money and monopolized it, preventing other small and medium-sized businesses from flourishing. This government, however, is moderate with immigration, supports small and medium producers or investors “including the self-employed (something that can be seen as a micro-enterprise of a few people)”, has moderate conservative ideas of a moral nature and in defense of the integrity of the nuclear family, &c., and, therefore, in Latin America it is seen as enemy number 1 of the agents of globalism and of what many are already aware of, of the New World Order «= Novus ordō sēclorum». Not that, to a certain extent, this government does not give way to certain International demands of these global elites, but it shows itself more as an obstacle than an obedient puppy.

And precisely for these and other reasons, the immense evasion of children from schools, the fact that many pass the year even in high school without even knowing how to write their own names. See the following information:

In other words, not only are many Brazilians or are functionally illiterate, many others are completely illiterate and many know practically nothing about mathematics, not even basic arithmetic «in reality, it is about the overwhelming majority»[4]. Therefore, it becomes imperative that these issues are absolutely fundamental to be dealt with by the next government, and if the next one belongs to Bolsonaro, it will certainly be a government that will aim at national strengthening in the face of a possible dismantling of this country by globalist agents, as in several aspects shows the agenda of PT Lula, among other candidates on the left of the economic and political spectrum.

Meanwhile in the NATO war against Russia, as it should be called, Putin and the Kremlin accuse the main NATO country, the US, of financing and arming Ukraine[5][6]; in fact, the US and other countries are even sending soldiers from their contingents of their armies, including NATO, to fight in place of the main contingents and generals who have already died in battle on the Ukrainian side.[7] Russia claims the red line has been crossed by the US, allies and NATO[8] regarding invasive interactions to aid Ukraine in this war which they would inevitably have initiated had the Russians not intervened and invaded; and, in fact, the US is now regarded by the Kremlin as an active participant in the war. This is escalating, according to the latest reference, to the point that if the US sends medium-range missiles, i.e. about 300 kilometers “with the ability to hit targets, therefore, within Russian national territory”, Russia will respond with any means necessary, possibly against the Americans. This could, of course, trigger a nuclear war. In the article it is written:

»In such a scenario, we would have to come up with an adequate response,” the spokeswoman said, adding that Russia “reserves the right to defend its territory using any means available.”« 

            Brazil is an economic giant, we all know that, although, however, it is not economically diversified and bears the name of the world’s breadbasket and yes, in fact, Brazil is largely an agricultural country. The capital of the elites of the European Union and the USA and allies will never favour the national interests of this country «including the solution of the problems mentioned in this article, among others, such as economic and energy diversification». Strategically, therefore, this country needs to move towards the BRICS and, therefore, like Iran and China, among others in this bloc, to approach Russia ‘also’, and this is what this government has been doing masterfully. I hope and we all hope that the conflict will be resolved soon without any nuclear conflagration “which would be absurdly disastrous”, which is international “just look at Taiwan, Japan and China and how geopolitically the war in Ukraine puts the Chinese in a delicate position”.[9] If the next government is Bolsonaro’s, it is to be expected, predicted or predicted that he will certainly address Beijing and the Kremlin, as well as among other members, such as Iran and India[10].

            There is a maxim of the Oracle of Delphi that says, “Certainty brings ruin.”, and, of course, only the future will tell whatever happens.


[2]The Worldometer website accessed on 09/16/2022 in the early hours of the morning.









– Finishing my Philosophy Course and, then, Studying what I want –

My hard time and long journey:

  • I am finishing, after more than a decade, in tortuous ways, with a LOT of suffering caused by family members practically ruining completely my life «and health altogether», my philosophy course. After I graduate, and most probably with honours, I will dedicate myself to a series of studies long overdue and delayed, to study physics and develop my Natural Philosophy, to study Mathematics, Classical Languages «including many ancient and medieval European ones and modern ones», and Music. Other topics I will surely study as well, as this site is a compendium of my perspectives over any scientific, philosophical, or aesthetical «and even about news and technology» studies and thoughts.
  • That said, I’ll then study, as I was, the software Geogebra, which is an excellent software for simulating physics and representing geometrically any mathematical body and functions, and as well continue my music courses which I started studying last year.

– The General NOT isolated Case that Lockdowns Generally do NOT work –

Here is the link to a site’s called «Lockdown Sceptics» showing evidence that, exempli gratia, in countries like Sweden, which did not partake in Lockdowns in 2020, had a significantly lower death ratio in the years 2019-2020 compared in the last 4 years before 2020, specially compared with the countries which did partake in the strategy of lockdowns. I am not saying this perspective and arguments are infallible, but statistics show that there is NO compelling evidence that lockdowns, including social distancing impedes the death number rates to increase or go higher. I bought a book by Alessandro Loiola MD, which is called «Fraudemia» which could be translated as «Fraudemic» in which he exposes his sceptical arguments against all this religious frenzy which is Covid-19. I will study his book carefully.